Jobs GoSDK schema migration

[edwardfeng-db]

Changes

• Make typeToSchema check and reuse information for registered resources in the resourceProviderRegistry
• Taking Library out of the registry because the only customization is not needed in other resources
• Migrating jobs resource schema to use the GoSDK schema
  • Constructed resource provider with CustomizeSchema function that takes in all of the existing customizations
  • Tried making the new schema as similar as possible to the original schema
  • Updated the schema used in the resource as well as in DataToStructPointer and StructToData function calls
  • Updated resource_job_test
• Adding CustomizeSchemaResourceSpecific function so that customizations don't always have to be shared for registry references

Tests

• [x] make test run locally
• [ ] relevant change in docs/ folder
• [x] covered with integration tests in internal/acceptance
• [x] relevant acceptance tests are passing
• [x] using Go SDK

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.55721% with 23 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.67%. Comparing base (4927dc0) to head (2991cee). Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3532      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.69%   82.67%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         183      184       +1     
  Lines       18826    18961     +135     
==========================================
+ Hits        15568    15676     +108     
- Misses       2341     2363      +22     
- Partials      917      922       +5     

Files	Coverage Δ
clusters/resource_cluster.go	84.81% <100.00%> (+0.08%)	:arrow_up:
clusters/resource_library.go	79.48% <100.00%> (+0.53%)	:arrow_up:
jobs/resource_job.go	91.61% <100.00%> (+1.74%)	:arrow_up:
common/customizable_schema.go	74.83% <30.00%> (-2.50%)	:arrow_down:
common/reflect_resource.go	80.90% <27.27%> (-1.26%)	:arrow_down:

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

[edwardfeng-db]

Triggered integration tests and confirmed that no failure is related to this change