DOC: mention tqdm-dask integration in the docs?

[raybellwaves]

https://github.com/tqdm/tqdm#dask-integration

Could be in https://docs.dask.org/en/latest/diagnostics-local.html (https://github.com/dask/dask/blob/main/docs/source/diagnostics-local.rst)

[ncclementi]

@raybellwaves thank you for raising an issue to bring awareness about the tqdm-dask integration.

Now looking at the links you provide, this integration seems to be on the tqdm end meaning tqdm-dask instead of dask-tqdm I wonder how do we handle documentation in these cases, since whenever there is an issue with the integration it will be resolved on the tqdm end. In the link you are suggesting to add this, you might notice that all the diagnostic tools are in the from dask.diagnostics. So I'm not sure it's a good fit.

@jrbourbeau @jsignell How do we handle documentation from integrations of the type package-dask where the integration was done on the package end?

[jsignell]

Some examples that I can think of are xgboost, xarray, cudf. I think so far we let the libraries handle the docs themselves with maybe a note in our docs that mention them. In the planned docs refresh there will be an ecosystem page where all such projects can be listed.