Alberto Leal
Alberto Leal
@m4rw3r Do you know if there's a better way to do `skip_many_till`? Essentially `many_till` that doesn't return.
@m4rw3r Thanks for the suggestion! I'll try to investigate this approach.
I might settle on a higher-order function as follows: ``` rust fn on_error(i: I, f: F, g: G) -> ParseResult where F: FnOnce(I) -> ParseResult, G: FnOnce(E, &I) -> V...
Here is an un-tested example; but essentially the same idea I've been using (keep in mind the implicit `require()`). This idea was based on this [gist](https://gist.github.com/spoike/2599a01d5cf2b50b7284). ``` js // cursor.js...
Alright. So, this is pretty much an anti-pattern with regards to isomorphism: ``` js var mixin = { componentWillMount: function() { Actions.load(); } }; ``` Here are some ideas I've...
No problem! Will keep you posted on my findings. I'll keep an eye on this repo to see what you've come up with. With regards to omniscient activity, I'd say...
Word. Thanks for creating robin-grow @vartan ! :+1: :tada:
Because of the *indirection* from compiling Rust to JavaScript/WASM, it'll probably be likely to be slower than your typical React (and Redux), Preact, or Vue web app.
That does seem surprising. 👍
I'm also curious what negative weights mean for when `only_long=1`. Some of the weights exceed 100%, which, I assume, the use of leverage/margin loans will make that a possibility.