Daniel Santiago

Is there any reason the above PR has not been merged in yet?

Please can the maintainers provide some feedback on this? Like @bryanrideshark, I agree that either proposed solution would be fine, although I feel like @bryanrideshark solution is cleaner, as long...

Thanks @AgentEnder, appreciate the feedback 🙏

> Hi @dasco144 , thanks for the PR! Just wanted to say it'll probably be ~few days/this weekend before I get a chance to look at it. Thanks! Let me...

I realised I did not update the `[README.markdown](https://github.com/stephenh/ts-proto/blob/main/README.markdown)` explaining this setting. I'll create a new PR to add this

I think this might be a nice feature to add. We could include additional information, like how the `protoc-gen-go` plugin does ```ts // Code generated by protoc-gen-go. DO NOT EDIT....

I'd be willing to take a stab at this

@stephenh I've got an PR ready for review 🙏

I can try rebase and get the builds passing if you're busy @stephenh

I managed to fix the error in the lint check, but the [build check ](https://github.com/dasco144/ts-proto/actions/runs/8712921825/job/23900259881#step:7:16)I'm not so sure about. When I run `yarn build:test` the output remains the same, and...