darrenfreeman

Results 42 comments of darrenfreeman

Well, it happened again, under similar conditions: ``` zfs send rpool/src@snapshot | pv | zfs recv -u -o recordsize=1M -o compression=zstd-19 rpool/dest ``` The output from pv indicates that 21.3...

Upon reboot, the pool status shows the same as above. A scrub has not begun, and the error shows the same, with `rpool/another/seventh/%recv`. The corresponding dataset had a `receive_resume_token`. I...

Once again, after the second scrub, the error is no longer shown. I haven't rebooted, and I have been sending other datasets to this pool in the meantime.

@Ornias1993 that was never conveyed to me. It's shipping in Debian without any warnings. Can you please link me to where it's been posted?

FWIW, I've diffed at least a TB of data between snapshots mounted side by side, lz4 and zstd-19. So far no differences found, no data loss that I'm aware of.

I have only seen public discussion in favour of zstd on zfs. If there are serious issues, then it needs to be given equal exposure. But for the record, is...

For myself, and anyone trying to follow this, is it safe to leave datasets as zstd? Is the issue purely that sometimes non-raw datasets can't be received without rendering the...

I am investigating without looking at any code. My current test is to recompress 3 TB, after dropping the L2ARC, SLOG, and stopping sanoid/syncoid. Many would find that a reasonable...

Well it's currently sending that 3 TB dataset from lz4 to zstd-19, with practically nothing else happening on the box. Here is the resource usage reported by `top`: ``` load...

Also @BrainSlayer it's doing 100-200 MB per *second*. I monitor this using `pv` in the pipe between send and receive.