Darrel
What happens when someone declares a Content-Type header for all responses and then adds a 204 response?
@webron Fine: content-length, Transfer-encoding, Range, ... how obscure do I need to get? :-)
@tedepstein Looks great to me. I'm going to add a note to tomorrow's agenda to discuss what next steps we can take. If you are able to make the meeting...
I'm not sure I see the benefits. Yes the root has one less property, but now the info object has one more. What is the benefit of having less properties...
Having now read OAI/sig-moonwalk#115 I see the reason for your proposal.
When I want to introduce warnings into a response, I borrow the warning header from the HTTP caching spec. It was designed to be generalized https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234#section-5.5 From my perspective, OpenAPI...
@sekharbans I feel that you are pitching your ideas to the wrong working group. If you believe that HTTP status codes are insufficient to describe the semantics of the response...
Reviewed by TSC (meeting 2017-12-15). Recognized that this is a valid requirement, but not convinced this is the right approach. More review required.
@mewalig While case 2 is appealing due to the removal of the need for the extra discriminator keyword, it does make codegen a bit more challenging. The appearance of a...
Re-opened for future consideration post v3.0.0