Antoine Poinsot
Antoine Poinsot
> as now one of your prospective counterparty in the flow can maliciously contribute an input hitting this policy limit. This is already possible today. Besides i don't see how...
Sorry to be this guy again, but it seems to me unreasonable to touch such critical consensus code for such marginal benefits. Unless observable benefits can be shown, i lean...
utACK f859ff8a4e9c3aa23bf5be6eceb7099ca72b2290
Here is a functional test which creates a transaction using an `OP_CODESEPARATOR` in its `scriptSig` (non-standard) but also uses an `OP_RETURN` right after, which makes it invalid by consensus. It...
Don't we already have an issue for this?
Also this information is already available in the coins' details, i don't think we should show it everywhere.
it seems like you imported a DB without importing the corresponding descriptor, which made bitcoind return an error, which made the poller thread crash and then the GUI crashed. I...
Clearly the watchonly wallet has no knowledge of the descriptor whatsoever, so it must not have been loaded. On Friday, June 21st, 2024 at 1:55 PM, pythcoiner ***@***.***> wrote: >>...
We restricted the RBF buttons to the transactions on purpose, because it may be surprising otherwise.
Concept ACK on eventually supporting testnet 4 but we can't support a network until our minimum supported version of Bitcoin Core supports it too. @plebhash (or anyone else) if you...