Changed distributedLock example to consider a new default port number

[amulyavarote]

Signed-off-by: Amulya Varote [email protected]

Description

Please explain the changes you've made

Changed distributedLock example to consider a new default port number to avoid default port conflict.

Issue reference

We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.

Please reference the issue this PR will close: #NA

Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list:

• [ ] Code compiles correctly
• [ ] Created/updated tests
• [ ] Extended the documentation

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #966 (9d749ef) into master (e87b9ad) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #966   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.78%   69.78%           
=======================================
  Files         156      156           
  Lines        5186     5186           
  Branches      555      555           
=======================================
  Hits         3619     3619           
  Misses       1435     1435           
  Partials      132      132           

Flag	Coverage Δ
net5	69.74% <ø> (ø)
net6	69.70% <ø> (ø)
netcoreapp3.1	69.74% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.