daos-stack
DAOS-11266 test: Extend ExecutableCommand for DdbCommandBase
ddb needs to run on a server host, but current implementation
of ExecutableCommand runs the command on the test host, so
override run() and use run_pcmd() so that we can pass in the target
host (server host) as parameter.
Add server_host parameter to DdbCommand and DdbCommandBase
class.
Update comments in Returns field in DdbCommand as it returns
a list now.
Skip-unit-tests: true Skip-fault-injection-test: true Test-tag: pr
Signed-off-by: Makito Kano [email protected]
Bug-tracker data: Ticket title is 'Implement TargetedExecutableCommand to run ddb on server host' Status is 'In Review' https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-11266
![github-actions[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Test stage checkpatch completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-9906/5/execution/node/119/log
Test stage Functional Hardware Large completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-9906/6/execution/node/737/log
@shimizukko what tests in the feature/cat_recovery branch use the DdbCommand class? Do any of them run in the HW Large stage?
@phender The test is not merged yet. It'll use the VM cluster.
So then this PR is not testing the code changes? There are no available tests to execute the code?
The https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-9906/6/ build failed to run the HW Large stage due to Failed to bring up interface ib1 on wolf-145.wolf.hpdd.intel.com. which means no HW Large tests were run. I'm just confirming that it would safe to land the changes as there are no HW Large tests that would have been used to verify the modified files.
@phender I didn't realize that the HW Large stage didn't run. I'll restart the stage. Thanks.