I had the unfortunate displeasure of trying to use a Texture Active.

[Dimcon]

I appreciate what this library attempts to achieve, but I can't consider it usable or recommendable for the many ways that it seems to break good programming practices. Such as:

• Relying on globals
• Changing state via unseen variable changes (frame.setDefault())
• Bad naming (zob, zot ??)

The one feature that made me look at the library, Texture actives.. I could not get to work. Seemed like an unmaintained feature (The constructor for a TextureActives object expects a list containing just one texture active?)

Great idea! But unfortunately the implementation has me looking elsewhere.