Danymat

Hmm it seems difficult to implement, as how we could retrieve easily the annotation and see if it has been changed Do you have any ideas ? Maybe with some...

> Really what's needed is a treesitter grammar for the annotations themselves-- so it would be a feature that relatively few languages support, but IMO definitely worth it for popular...

> you could retrieve the old annotation the problem is: how do you know something is the old annotation ? That's why having a parser for annotations could be a...

> you just get the comment about the function and check if it's kinda like the annotations format e.g. `---`in lua Even though, this check is not sufficient, take a...

One way to handle this, would be to keep the Information about created annotation (with marks) But that would mean that exiting neovim will lose the informations

Hello ! Thanks for your feedback ! > Hi, great plugin that has little to be desired. One question though, and maybe I am probably missing something, but i don't...

I prefer having a command called 'Neogen all_file' (or smt like that) to do on file scope. But the problem is that Neogen is not written with this idea in...

Hello! thanks for chiming in ! > vim-doge doesn't need to specify the type to annotate. Could we have similar features? In theory we could indeed, but we need to...

Sorry for putting this feat on hold, as it was the holidays season. I'm thinking about it right now: Do you know what's the logic behind vim-doge automatic selection ?...

This will have the same complexity (mostly) as this issue (point 2): https://github.com/danymat/neogen/issues/53#issuecomment-1050269103 I will try to keep this open for a while, in case someone wants to comment