Daniel Woste

Sounds promising and I'm looking forward for the PR :) I like most **make_inherited_id**, as it only combines two given ids (parent + child) without generating something. As I'm writing...

Thanks for reporting. :+1: That's a tough one because the content of a Sphinx-Needs node gets rendered by Sphinx internally outside the document. So it only knows the "outer" directive...

@arwedus Thanks for reporting. @danieleades made some tests regarding Python 3.6 support and figured out, that some tests are failing with Python 3.6 and Sphinx >3.0. See https://github.com/useblocks/sphinxcontrib-needs/pull/154#issuecomment-703848972 However, I...

@danieleades: Thanks for joining this discussion so quickly. I have created PR #314 and activated in general Sphinx 4.0 tests for all Python versions. Our github config missed totally Sphinx...

Thanks for the hint :+1: It has worked as expected. And here are the [results](https://github.com/useblocks/sphinxcontrib-needs/actions/runs/989111125) for the current PR #314 :  A little strange that no Python 3.6 based...

Yeah, I noticed this as well. Sh**. Should be fixed on master with above PR.

Puhh, that would be a lot of work to do. From the technical point of view, this makes totally sense. But I'm afraid that there are so many pieces in...

I like the idea. Maybe we can automatically create for each option, like ``status``, the related option ``status_changed`` with starting value ``0``. And each modification via ``needextend`` raises this number....

PR-413 has not workded. This is an answer to the discussion in #413. Mainly to the last comment by arwedus: https://github.com/useblocks/sphinxcontrib-needs/pull/497#issuecomment-1047506164 --- You are right, ``_images`` needs to be cleaned...

Not really sure, my questions got not answered in #501. For @StephanKuempel solution I need to get it in a PR. Looks like this will change the location and so...