Dan Trevino

Didn't we already go through this? https://github.com/blockstack/app-mining/issues/73

@njordhov do you have any examples?

While I agree we need categories to help focus TryMyUI reviews, my concern is that, in terms of payouts, it shifts the concern from 'Why is my app valued the...

This is anti-free software. The implication that only profit-seeking applications are valuable is a wrong and ignores that last 25+ years of software innovation.

@sdsantos I personally, would argue against that as well. In my opinion, we should not put any constraints on what software is being incentivized. There is a place, really a...

Can we get an update on this? Why is it closed? What specific dimensions are being added? Why can the public not get input on those? Can this issue be...

@joshthegreatavenue some open questions that might solidify this a bit: 1. How would you measure "more engagement" vs "low engagement" by dapp devs? What are the concrete things that you...

> Early in the program we had an investor community reviewer (similar population of people) and failed because it wasn't objective or unbiased. The App Miners voted to close this...

I like this basic premise. Monetizing an expansion of open standards is novel.

@friedger yet your proposal only discusses a stat mechanism that excludes those apps you praise for privacy. -1 for theblockstats being mentioned anywhere near app-mining algorithms. It seems like the...