tacofancy
tacofancy copied to clipboard
dansinker
Migrating to Organization Repo
So, basically, shit got crazy- this project now has [as of this writing] 432 stars and 108 forks.
In order to keep up participation on open source taco related projects (ie, issue #94), we should probably consolidate all taco related repos into one organization.
@evz / @meetar.
This is far, far outside my Github knowledge.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Eric van Zanten [email protected]:
What's the cleanest way of doing this? Transfer ownership of the projects?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sinker/tacofancy/issues/98#issuecomment-28418483 .
Transfer ownership or fork into the organization are the two options. 1 is better.
-Hunter
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:09 PM, sinker [email protected] wrote:
This is far, far outside my Github knowledge.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Eric van Zanten [email protected]:
What's the cleanest way of doing this? Transfer ownership of the projects?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/sinker/tacofancy/issues/98#issuecomment-28418483> .
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sinker/tacofancy/issues/98#issuecomment-28418562 .
Let the organisation fork-it, and post a note of the change on the read-me . nice, clean, standard
problem with forking into the organization is that this URL is out there if we transfer vs fork it will redirect, right?
Github redirects old repo url to new repo url when a repo is transferred.
I like the idea of transferring. However, looks like whoever owns the repo has to have admin access to the org: https://help.github.com/articles/how-to-transfer-a-repository
Who started the org? @santheo?