fixed #14331 - suppressions with line number not reported as unmatched

[firewave]

[firewave]

The cfg test failures are caused by missing configurations.

[firewave]

The Python test is passing locally for me - needs more looking into.

[firewave]

The cfg test failures are caused by missing configurations.

See at least https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/1059#comment:11 among possibly other tickets.

[firewave]

The Python test is passing locally for me - needs more looking into.

Ah, they fail only with -j2.

[sonarqubecloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[firewave]

The cfg test failures are caused by missing configurations.

See at least https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/1059#comment:11 among possibly other tickets.

Actually this is related to __cplusplus already being defined (always). When macros are flagged as built-in (see https://github.com/danmar/simplecpp/pull/547) we might be able to add some handling for this.

I filed https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/14333 about it.

[firewave]

This needs more looking into regarding inline suppressions in inactive code.