Daniel Turek

Now that's pretty funny @perry @perrydv

@perrydv I'm fine either way, but big picture, if it's not too much trouble, I'm of the opinion we should have an easy way of handling these (e.g., a list...

@perrydv If it's a trivial addition to make, then it seems quite reasonable.

Yes, certainly. In an earlier project I was working on (about 2 years ago now) they were modelling manatee deaths. Some deaths due to different causes were known, and we...

I’d say both, for sure.

Yes, this is a legitimate concern @paciorek . Maybe it would be best if we inserted some checking into the R code which does sampler assignments. If a `posterior_predictive_branch` sampler...

@paciorek Agreed and understood. I'll put it on my "get to it when I can" list, which won't be for this upcoming release.

@paciorek This case is still not handled by the `posterior_predictive` sampler, but I'm ok with that for now. It feels like a fairly rare case to me. If we agree...

@paciorek Maybe I'm missing something here, and this might sound like a work-around rather than fixing the root problem. But when we auto-generate the `r` function, could we create it...

Surely one of more of the standard BUGS examples (which are tested in test-mcmc) have RHS only nodes? If not that, then the testing for the elliptical slice sampler, and...