danielresnick

Gotcha, I think we should try to rephrase a bit then even independent of the potential introduction of append-granularity since the language is a bit contradictory: "The client SHOULD respect...

Sure thing I've spun off #3321

Thanks for the feedback @gstrauss. Just to make sure I'm understanding, you're suggesting that the proposed carve out for final chunks ("Requests completing the upload by including the `Upload-Complete: ?1`...

Noting before I forget: assuming I understood @gstrauss 's feedback correctly I think min-append-size also has this discrepancy as-is, so we should aim to be consistent for both. That is...

> Today, the draft intends that 409 to be used for the cases where the server is certain that the client is non-compliant. E.g. resumed from a different offset from...

Thanks @guoye-zhang! Apologies for the slow reply here - lots been going on. In your example I agree the server should abort the in-flight (cellular) request as soon as it's...

That interpretation sounds reasonable to me though I think @guoye-zhang had a different one (see https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/3193#issuecomment-3469526528). @guoye-zhang do you think it's realistic and not too onerous for clients like UrlSession...

Thanks that makes sense, mostly just looking for signal on whether you have strong feelings about what direction the spec goes here as an owner of a key client impl