Daniel K.

Consuming @xstate/compiled/react in monorepo

7

 Here is the minimal repo that shows this problem: https://github.com/FredyC/xstate-codegen-monorepo ```bash yarn install yarn machinery codegen yarn web validate ``` I have no idea why it should be a...

Typescript path aliases cannot be used

2

I am using path aliases quite heavily. An example of my `tsconfig.json`. ```json { "compilerOptions": { "baseUrl": "src", "paths": { "~machinery/graphql": ["generated/machinerygraphql"], "~machinery/*": ["*"], "~tools/*": ["../../tools/src/*"] }, }, } ```...

Initial state

3

I definitely like the idea and mostly of how it's implemented, but the somewhat big caveat to me as DRY guy is repeating the initial state. I mean with regular...

Support Node v10?

1

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** On Windows, it's a pain to have multiple Node versions, even with Windows version of `nvm` it means to constantly...

Anyone using react-stamp?

1

Now when React Hooks are available providing composability out of the box, it doesn't seem that stamps provide any benefit. According to NPM, there is still a couple of downloads,...

Automatically setting displayName for a component

1

Just an idea, I'm not sure if it doesn't collide with something else at this point, but what about defining component like this: ``` js const MyComponent = () =>...

This looks really cool. I am curious though if you are planning to support export to RN as well? Seeing samples showing some mobile app, it would make complete sense...

Use async act

2

@trojanowski I've already done it in my fork. Would you be if I do it here as well? Or are you waiting for official React 16.9? I would say it...

Thoughts

76

From all those proposals from RFC this one definitely looks the tidiest :) I am curious how you would approach custom hooks? In my opinion, these are what makes React...

Using binding-ts for defining resolvers

8

I am not entirely sure what is the use case for `binding-ts` generator. I assume it's not meant to add type safety to resolvers? Either way, if I would like...