Dan Perry
Dan Perry
This CHIP is now a `Draft`. It proposes a new standard for CATs which can be revoked by the issuing entity. If it is accepted, it will exist along with...
> Do we need to clarify that in the CHIP? Yes we should clarify this. Feel free to do so, else I can also do it.
This CHIP is now in `Review`. Please leave your reviews here.
> I would recommend allowing the option when the CATs are issued, the issuer can choose to whether or not to enable time limited clawbacks by the holder. An issuer...
> burn Good point -- "burn" is incompatible with revocable CATs. They can, however, be melted, and that is permanent.
> @Rigidity Everything you've said is correct, but it doesn't take away from the concern that most of this behavior is brand new and needs to be understood by the...
I added a note to the `Security` section of this CHIP making it clear that one should never assume that revocable CATs have been burned because the issuer can always...
This CHIP is now in `Last Call`. If no changes are required in the next two weeks, then it will be moved to `Final` status and no further changes will...
This CHIP is now `Final`. No further changes are allowed.
This CHIP from [Arvid Norberg](https://github.com/arvidn) provides the necessary timelines for the hard fork to support [CHIP-48](https://github.com/Chia-Network/chips/pull/160). It is now a `Draft`. Feel free to leave your reviews here.