Daniel Sabanes Bove

@0liver0815 I think we would need to refine the task here, if it is relevant. Would you like to add more details to the description?

Thanks @PuzzledFace , in the light of prioritizing next CRAN release, and since this anyway breaks almost everything I think... I wonder if we can make this simpler? Without all...

Thanks @PuzzledFace, generally I agree - however in this case the whole package breaks anyway due to the many changes we did. Therefore I would say in this special case...

Thanks @marlenesg for posting this so we can improve this later. I think one approach here could be to label this as a "deep" test which would be skipped on...

@wwojciech yeah I guess it would be consistent to also use the settings in these cases.

@0liver0815 yeah good point. The user can anyway override this "maximum" though by specifying the number of cores manually. What we could do is to provide a more clever automated...

cool thanks @0liver0815 ! good that you found where this 5 is - I really don't remember that anymore. PR will be nice, otherwise when @wwojciech is getting there with...

Thanks John for your initiative on this. Regarding simulations, I think it is a bit early to start coding on this now, since we should first improve the HPC compatibility...

Thanks John - yeah for sure design work can start before, no problem. As a principle it would be perfect to first close out the ongoing issues and PRs, so...

thx @wwojciech , moved to backlog for now.