Daniel Huppmann

Thank you for the quick response, @kimonker - the other scenarios looked ok from my quick assessment, but I'd appreciate if you can take a more thorough look. Once I...

Thanks @consideRatio for the feedback - it's great to see that the assessment notebooks are being used! # General response The notebooks and the repository, as well as the `pyam`...

Not closing this issue for now, hoping for a PR from you, @consideRatio... Please close this issue if you feel you won't have time for it.

Thanks @masahirosugiyama for making this suggestion. We are continuously working on improving the data warehouse powering the scenario explorer and database infrastructure, check out https://github.com/iiasa/ixmp for the core module. cc...

Thank you @nroming for identifying this issue. This variable is included as reported by the modelling team, and the variable definition (see below) is actually not explicit on how to...

I would be cautious about removing any data. If someone (nudge, @nroming?) would feel up to writing a script that computes a new harmonised policy cost timeseries, we could include...

Sorry that I didn't add a proper environment specification at the time... Seems that the last time I updated and ran the notebooks, pyam 0.5 was the stable release. I'll...

Thanks for your work on resolving this issue, @bmcmullin! Very glad that the extra effort with deprecation warnings when going from the hot-development phase to the first stable release was...

Thank you for identifying this issue @volker-krey!

Thanks @masahirosugiyama for raising this issue. As you can see from the [rendered notebook (cell [15])](https://data.ene.iiasa.ac.at/sr15_scenario_analysis/assessment/sr15_2.5_carbon_price_analysis.html) or the source code on [GitHub](https://github.com/iiasa/ipcc_sr15_scenario_analysis/blob/master/assessment/sr15_2.5_carbon_price_analysis.ipynb), these scenarios were excluded from the analysis in...