Daniel Fett

@joelposti You're raising a couple of very good points here! > The proposed claim set does not seem to include a claim that would specify the namespace/credential type `eu.europa.ec.eudi.pid.1` in...

Looks good to me, thank you! Maybe a small improvement would be to introduce a name for disclosure? ``` ALPHA = %x41-5A / %x61-7A ; A-Z / a-z DIGIT =...

@jovfer Can you please address the comments/proposed changes above?

> @Sakurann - Changed to `SD-JWT-KB`, since the `SD-JWT/KB` looked weird to me (division seemed like the wrong metaphor) and `SD-JWT~KB` seemed a little too cute. Also merged `master` while...

> Edit: I still think we should call it "SD-JWT+KB", which nicely captures that the KB is an "add-on". I would appreciate if the PR could change SD-JWT-KB to SD-JWT+KB.

I'd be fine with having `cnf` as the only defined mechanism but leaving the door open for `cnfs` or similar.

> It requires that disclosure be processed in a particular order, and since this order is known only to the redactor, the disclosures in the SD-JWT must be listed in...

This is almost the same we have now, just with fewer details. The only difference is that you have to walk through the JSON tree instead of iterate on the...

We discussed this on the editor's call. Consensus is to keep the feature, in particular since there are some data structures that require recursive disclosures for SD-JWT to be useful...

@bifurcation Can you please propose a PR for this?