aricpp

aricpp copied to clipboard

Should the channel destructor stop issuing an hangup?

1

Currently, `Channel` destructor issues a hangup to asterisk. Is it correct/useful?

daniele77

### Discussed in https://github.com/daniele77/aricpp/discussions/57 Originally posted by **ferchor2003** June 23, 2021 In my existing application I already have a custom mechanism to log information. I want to use that in...

daniele77

Ability to use wss and https

3

In environments where security is required, we need to be able to connect to Asterisk using secure web socket (wss) and send/receive POST requests over https. The application should provide...

ferchor2003

daniele77

Adding clang-format

4

This pull request adds a clang-format definition that tries to limit the amount of changes to the project. However, there are some inconsistencies in the current formatting that get reformatted...

mredd

In the high_level_dial and low_level_dial sample, the order of the operations should be modified to first add the channels to the bridge and then dial the outgoing channel. In this...

daniele77

I'd like to write a sequence of aricpp operation in this way: ``` ch1->Hangup() .Then([=](){ return bridge->Destroy(); }) .Then([=](){ return ch2->Hold(); }) .Then([=](){ cout

daniele77

Currently, `Client` can receive events from just one stasis application (first problem?) but one must specify the application as a parameter of `Channel::Call` (second problem?)

daniele77

Check the authentication mechanism in `HttpClient` class. At the first request, the client directly submit the authorization. Maybe it should first issue a simple request then, once receiving a negative...

daniele77

Add a coroutine interface, to simplify the async programming, emulating a sequential one.

daniele77