Daniela Brozzoni
Daniela Brozzoni
https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/2c324d3759aed4548269084327c94ce91e7b386a/crates/bdk/src/wallet/mod.rs#L1993-L1997 In `Wallet::get_descriptor_for_keychain(keychain)`, if a user passes in a non-existent keychain, we instead return the descriptor associated with `KeychainKind::External`. What's the reason behind this behavior? IMHO we should just return...
Right now if users want to know if a transaction was removed from the chain, or dropped from the mempool, they need to compare two versions of `list_unspent` obtained in...
Otherwise we might merge code that doesn't build. See https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/pull/1358
See https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/pull/1203#discussion_r1491860268
Looking at wallet_esplora or wallet_electrum, syncing takes quite a bit of code, and I suppose than 99% of users will just want to update the whole wallet in one big...
Some KeychainTxOutIndex methods panic if a non-existent keychain is passed in as an argument. Some examples include: - `unbounded_spk_iter` - `next_index` Instead, the methods that return an iterator simply return...
We can probably have more descriptive names, and that make it easier to distinguish between them (I keep confusing them, maybe it's just me). I don't have any proposal in...
Remove the `tx_data_traits.rs` file and move all of it's contents into `chain_data.rs`. Also move the `Balance` struct into `chain_data.rs`. See https://discord.com/channels/753336465005608961/753367451319926827/1161983570538147932
Hey, I'm trying to set up a trezor emulator using this command: ``` ❯ hwi --device-type trezor -i setup ``` The emulator prompts me with a "Enter new pin" screen...