Dan Brickley

Didn't we did this? https://schema.org/Collection

well kind of. /Collection was originally somewhat implicitly CreativeWork oriented. I made some modest tweak to its wording recently to allow a subtype for /ProductCollection but potentially there could also...

Thank you for all this! You've clearly put a lot of work into these investigations, so we should talk about how best to progress things from here. Schema.org in general...

This is interesting data - many thanks for sharing. I would resist moving things like "price" directly onto /Product. /cc @mfhepp ... however it is still great usability feedback.

Could we make a first pass at this through changing the textual definitions, rather than the type name? The words we choose for types are rarely perfect matches for the...

Are these covered in GS1's lists? https://www.gs1.org/voc/AllergenTypeCode There are many allergen situations we don't cover currently. https://schema.org/RestrictedDiet was based on the list of meal types used in the airplane industry.

Comment from @vholland : "The idea was to change to a less generic name so we could reuse "timezone" for something truly generic."

(I've updated the original post for readability of the code example.)

@simr1994 - I would suggest being guided by particular features that use (or don't use) schema.org terms. For Google these are at https://developers.google.com/search/docs/guides/search-gallery but I'm not aware of any specific...

These are unsorted and need issues. - [ ] https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Sports - [ ] https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/PeriodicalsComics - [ ] https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/HistoricalDataSchema - [ ] https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/BioDatabases - [ ] https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Breadcrumbs - [ ] https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/DiscussionSchema