Dan Brickley

I didn't know DC had copied the name. It looks like they have subtly different meanings. /cc @tombaker

Thanks Matthias! Do you have a sense for how this application area relates to W3C Verifiable Credentials? On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 09:59, Matthias Wiesmann ***@***.***> wrote: > Many...

I discussed this with @alex-jansen and @MatthiasWiesmann Context - This is a proposal from Google based on our experience consuming schema.org [Product](https://schema.org/Product) and [Organization](https://schema.org/Organization) markup and working with similar data...

Thanks @alex-jansen - thanks for moving this along. Looking forward to comments from folks pinged here!

Thanks all for the speedy comments :) @msporny - is it fair to say that this vocabulary (alongside rest of schema.org) ought to be something we can just "drop in"...

@philbarker if Person were to be added to the domain of hasCertification, can you suggest some basic examples that we should work for education/occupation/skills etc.?

@MatthiasWiesmann @alex-jansen can you tweak your draft changes to address these comments, especially making sure we have a few more examples as discussed above?

I don't believe we cover that case currently. It would be a pity to add something just for that one site, but a general structure could be useful.

If anyone would like to progress this, please find a collection of (e.g. 10-15) different rating schemes that are not currently captured by https://schema.org/Rating, so we can compare their representational...

Other considerations: * Twitter thread: https://twitter.com/danbri/status/1427514945181298702 * what should rating system providers do to authoritatively document their own schemes? can we make simple cases simple and complex / long-tail complex...