Dale King
Dale King
An assertion of the form ``` assertThat(5).isIn(1, 2, 3, 4) ``` Displays an incorrect message: > expected: to contain: That should be more like > expected: to be in:
It would be real nice if there was a way around this limitation of not being able to cal mock or spy generically: https://mokkery.dev/docs/Limitations#calling-mock--spy. The first problem is knowing which...
Starting to use this library now, there are a couple of API suggestions I have: - DebugDrawerInfo takes a String for the info parameter. Why isn't that just of `Any?`...