Dag Wieers

Can we see this merged? It would be nice to know exactly what has not been covered by tests.

This would be wonderful. I also wondered why this was not possible as we needed this. We actually had to refactor our interface (causing incompatibilities) because this wasn't possible.

Thanks for that, but we would prefer to use the original project *with* your fixes ;-)

Can we have this proposed in a separate PR? I think this one isn't controversial.

Whatever makes it acceptable for merging ;-) I hate to have to see the self-evident stuff being kept hostage over the controversial ones. It also makes it harder to review...

Still waiting for that PR. ;-) I looked in #10 and apart from #9 (#8 not so much) I see other fixes in #10 I like and would like to...

I don't mind helping or testing. Let me know.

@tamland Can this be merged?

@tamland Is there a problem merging this one?

So I can see this work in various ways: ### Fixed frequency (server-side control) Every successful request would be answered with a **Next-Request-After** header with X hours in the future....