dagster
dagster copied to clipboard
[DS][25/n] Narrow extra_state type
Summary & Motivation
As title -- we only need a subset of the full PackableValue type, and can always widen this later
How I Tested These Changes
-
#21641
: 2 dependent PRs (#21670
, #21671
) -
#21640
-
#21648
-
#21615
-
#21613
👈 -
#21612
-
#21573
-
#21546
-
#21545
-
#21541
-
#21540
-
#21539
-
#21538
-
#21537
-
#21536
-
#21535
-
#21521
-
#21520
-
#21511
: 1 other dependent PR (#21512
) -
#21510
-
#21508
-
#21507
-
#21505
-
#21504
-
#21503
-
#21502
-
#21501
-
#21500
-
#21499
-
master
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.
Join @OwenKephart and the rest of your teammates on
Graphite
Fine with not giving it a name, but I don't want to mess with disallowing a singular AssetSubset at the moment (as we have plenty of already-stored information that is just a single AssetSubset)
Makes complete sense to not change then given that we are dealing with already persisted data 👍🏻