Maksim Volkau
Maksim Volkau
@qwertie Yes, it works but it does not call the macro with the `#runSequence` - that's why. The call to `operator
@qwertie Ok, for the test purposes I have added the `Test.ecs` (https://github.com/dadhi/LempTest/blob/master/CompileTimeDI/Test.ecs) The first time LeMP complained to me to add the `#useSequenceExpressions;` and then it is worked out! I've...
@qwertie Added example into `Test.ecs` of trying to use macro inside the `compileTime` and it does not work: ```cs compileTime { #ecs; using System (.Text, ); using Loyc (.Syntax, .Ecs,...
@qwertie Thanks for looking, will try it out.
> In order for your original idea to work, you need a uniquely-named temporary variable, though - which is supported in a post-prerelease commit Great, it is better and better.
I can confirm that the fix is working. Now I can have an operator like this: ```cs [PriorityOverride, Passive] define operator
> I thought that ?. was a single operator Now I get it, can live with this - will change the code on my side.
Thanks for looking.. I am not interested in namespaces so much, but rather in extension methods and more simple folder references, and other goodies e.g. `using static`. I will check...
> it does not support extension methods Hmm, this is the full script which works for me: ```cs public static string Bang(this string x) => x switch { { Length...
@qwertie Currently, there is a trend to provide minimal (or single file) solutions to the historically big entreprizy problems. I think it is a good opportunity to demonstrate LeMP. Or...