Dave Abrahams
Dave Abrahams
Yes I'm interested as to why you say that, but another thread please.
All newly added code should be covered by tests.
Update: prior setup-vsdevenv is still needed; otherwise we pick up the wrong `link.exe`.
Update: the problem was introduced between 0.2.2 and 0.2.3; upgrading to 0.2.2 is no problem for us. Apparently it has something to do with changes to "vs2002 compatibility setup"
> Does the problem go away if you add an additional, explicit call to gha-setup-vsdevenv with the default arguments, to replace the implicit call that was removed? I could try...
Without line numbers for the issues, I can't make head or tail of the errors.
> On Sep 17, 2024, at 11:44 PM, Dimi Racordon ***@***.***> wrote: > > there is no formal argument for accepting the function above but not the one from the...
To put it differently, it could be reduced to just `sink`, but then we'd have the wrong default. You'd be writing a lot of `sink var`s and few `sink`s.
Now I'm starting to understand one possible reason for the date stamp: [github won't replace an existing cache with the same key](https://github.com/actions/cache/issues/342#issuecomment-1399247646), which they don't warn us about. But then...
> there are reports about problems especially when actions run in parallel. Sure, if two jobs running in parallel try to write the same cache, there's a race condition. It...