Carsten Ziegeler

This has already been applied

I assume we will handle this on a spec by spec base where we might handle it differently for each spec. We might also not update some specs like the...

What is the general plan? Will new specs only support api from the jakarta namespace? Or both? Or do we decide per spec?

I would assume that you can handle supporting the old packages via wrappers - should at least work for http whiteboard. I would prefer that as well

ok, fair enough - in that case, we must make sure that implementations can support javax packages without a high burden. For example, if we have an api package in...

Right, I'm exactly worried about that class - if we provide a 2.0 API with a ServletContextHelper bound to the jakarata package

Picking a side is not really user friendly - I understand thats what servlet engine implementations are currently doing, but we can do better. Regardless, at least for http whiteboard,...

> > The runtime service is agnostic of the package space > > Except for the `ServletContextHelper`, which references `HttpServletRequest` and `HttpServletResponse` > ah sorry, I meant everything in the...

Should we move this discussion to a http whiteboard specific issue? As mentioned I see an easy path forward which hopefully will make BJ and everyone else happy :) I...

Created #381 for http whiteboard