Lukasz Czerwinski

icon indicating an email [email protected]

icon company EonD, @Xfaang icon location Warsaw, Poland icon location CTO at EonD (Expertise on Demand); Software Architect at Xfaang (@Xfaang)

Results 75 comments of Lukasz Czerwinski

int[] syntax sugar for array(int) constructor

The scope of this task is to adapt the pegjs parser to accept the new 'int[]' syntax in addition to the current one. As for the details of the syntax...

int[] syntax sugar for array(int) constructor

Great, congrats, Filip :) Feel free to ask questions here or contact with us on our [Discord channel](https://discord.gg/pYdzypH).

int[] syntax sugar for array(int) constructor

Filip, by the way, didn't you want to work on https://github.com/xFAANG/askql/issues/52 instead? ;) @Fifciu

int[] syntax sugar for array(int) constructor

Cool :)

int[] syntax sugar for array(int) constructor

Cool, @Tuhaj

int[] syntax sugar for array(int) constructor

@Tuhaj , it's been a couple of weeks since you were assigned. Any thoughts or progress on this one?

Restore tests for 'remote' block

Blocked on https://github.com/xFAANG/askql/issues/371

[vscode] Provide Function and Method Signatures Tooltips via Language Server

Blocked on #45 (type semantics)

Should if (condition) { ... } allow if condition { ... } syntax?

Not sure about that, might degrade readability.

Should if (condition) { ... } allow if condition { ... } syntax?

> > Not sure about that, might degrade readability. > > Can you show an example where this degrades readability? If we allow both syntaxes, which one should the formatter...