Issue 7306 add query custom commands

[BlueWinds]

• Closes

User facing changelog

Not ready for review yet.

Additional details

Steps to test

How has the user experience changed?

PR Tasks

• [ ] Have tests been added/updated?
• [ ] Has the original issue (or this PR, if no issue exists) been tagged with a release in ZenHub? (user-facing changes only)
• [ ] Has a PR for user-facing changes been opened in cypress-documentation?
• [ ] Have API changes been updated in the type definitions?

[cypress-bot[bot]]

Thanks for taking the time to open a PR!

• Create a Draft Pull Request if your PR is not ready for review. Mark the PR as Ready for Review when you're ready for a Cypress team member to review the PR.
• Become familiar with the Code Review Checklist for guidelines on coding standards and what needs to be done before a PR can be merged.

[cypress[bot]]

---

Test summary

4056 • 0 • 349 • 0 • 0

---

Run details

Project	cypress
Status	Passed
Commit	0eecaed6a8
Started	Oct 5, 2022 7:32 PM
Ended	Oct 5, 2022 7:44 PM
Duration	12:09 💡
OS	Linux Debian - 11.4
Browser	Electron 106

View run in Cypress Dashboard ➡️

---

This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings. You can manage this integration in this project's settings in the Cypress Dashboard

[lmiller1990]

Quick smoke test before review. It works as expected.

Cypress 10.9

issue-7306-addQuery-custom-commands

[chrisbreiding]

I guess this PR can close this issue since cy.ng() won't be around anymore.

[BlueWinds]

Ok, took longer than I'd hoped but have all tests passing (except one which I commented out with a TODO to re-enable as part of a follow-up - since this is into a feature branch, I'd like to put that off for now and start work related to .within() in a fresh PR).

[BlueWinds]

@chrisbreiding - Merged develop into issue-7306, then rebased this PR off that branch. I'll be more careful about that in the future; I thought that if I merged develop into both branches, it would work itself out, but apparently not!