Aleksa Sarai
Aleksa Sarai
I don't think so @mrunalp -- `fstype` has always been ignored for all of the key flags (`MS_BIND`, `MS_MOVE`, `MS_REMOUNT` ...). The issue we had in the past was that...
I think it's trivial enough it doesn't need to be blocked on 1.0, but I don't really mind (it's a no-op change anyway).
@AkihiroSuda @kolyshkin Does cgroupv2 still require systemd, or is systemd support only required if you're using cgroupv2 on a systemd system? (From memory the early design required it, but I...
> Even on systemd hosts, the systemd driver was never strictly required in practice, but future version of systemd may strictly require it, in theory. "Required" may have been too...
/ping @opencontainers/runc-maintainers
This actually presents us with the possibility to fix a long-standing bug in `runc ps`. Currently `runc ps` assumes that the first field of `ps` is the PID -- but...
@AkihiroSuda There isn't an implementation of the psflags yet. I spoke to @marcov about it yesterday and gave an outline of how it should be done. Hopefully one of us...
No. Very few PRs are needed for 1.0 (and general view is that if there is a like this one which will take significant effort to get ready for 1.0,...
The default is EPERM because that is the historical default and we need to maintain backwards compatibility with older configurations. However, in runc we have a somewhat complicated mechanism to...
This has bitten me in the past as well. And now is the part where I pitch openSUSE :wink: -- the `opensuse/leap:15.1` image is smaller than the Debian one and...