Jason N
Jason N
I think it might be a good idea to move the new data member to the end anyway because that will mean that applications written for 1.6.0 will again work...
Yes actually, I think you're right - there already are accessor functions for these, and they don't need the callback data struct at all, so it will all work if...
> I'm not a C programmer, so it's good to know that the struct isn't enough. I guess you might be using offsets from a pointer to it. > >...
> @cyderize Please would you let me know if what's in #1748 is what you had in mind. > > It would also be great to understand why the `const...
I think this is because of the deep nesting of the `++` operators - at the moment expressions like `a ++ b ++ c ++ d` are parsed as `(((a...
Interestingly for me the parentheses work (i.e. parentheses around the first 512 terms, and then another set of parentheses around the last 512 terms). Unfortunately it's not really possible to...
I haven't been able to reproduce this so far - do you have any steps that would allow me to reproduce this consistently?
Thanks for reporting this issue. Indeed the user configuration directory was not being created when modifying the solver search paths. This will be fixed in the next release. As a...
I believe we have now fixed this issue in 2.7.0 - previously it was possible for the main window to spawn somewhere off-screen (especially in multi monitor setups after unplugging...
As far as I'm aware, this has only been implemented on macOS, and it still seems to work. What OS are you using? On Windows (and Linux too, I believe),...