Chris Wilson

I would suggest a less stringent definition of consensus, e.g. a 2/3 supermajority after discussion by all parties.

Noting that the Council is still an experiment - if we wanted the Council to take on roles like this, other than as a "last resort" of resolving Formal Objections,...

@OR13 I see a lot of analogies to the incubation process, with many of the same difficulties. 1. You can't demand review until the details are somewhat set; otherwise the...

Would be interested to understand where the authority (and ability to object) goes for UN-appointing (that is, removing) chairs, as well.

It's unclear how one "objects" to an "announcement"?

Can these be objected to today? Because I would have done so. On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 6:46 AM David Singer wrote: > it's the decisions represented in the...

In my experience, It is absolutely unclear that one even CAN "object" to an announcement of a new chair being chosen.

The tenor of these announcements today is drastically different than progressing a Rec-track document, for example: the Team simply announces who the new chair is. In effect, your objection would...

Yes, but pretty much every decision is put through a poll, with an option to Formally Object, except for chair appointments outside of the charter process. (That includes chair removals,...

Actually, in the discussion, we were not connecting this to incubation at all; the discussion we had in the AB was largely around "we should set an expectation of resolution...