[Bug]: Naming scheme

[moskovskiy82]

What happened?

All the integrations within HA follow a standard scheme without adding the protocol information in front. Which is not the case with ble_monitor. All the enitiy_ids get a ble suffix in front. Of course entity id's can be renamed individually but... Although this will be a breaking change - ibelieve it will affect only new users of the integration. I might be wrong

Sensor type

All of them

Relevant log output

Not applicable

[sg1888]

Changing the naming scheme will definitely impact the BLE Gateway integration, which enables ESP32 devices to forward BLE messages for BLE Monitor to parse. https://github.com/myhomeiot/esphome-components#ble-gateway.

The impact is with the template sensor, which searches for any device tracker or sensor that starts with ble_. Full code below:

template:

• binary_sensor:
  • name: BLE Gateway icon: mdi:bluetooth state: "{{ is_state('input_boolean.settings_ble_gateway', 'on') }}" attributes: devices: "{{ states | selectattr('entity_id', 'search', '^(device_tracker|sensor).ble_') | selectattr('attributes.mac_address', 'defined') | map(attribute='attributes.mac_address') | unique | sort | join('') | replace(':', '') ~ (states('input_text.settings_ble_gateway_add_device') | replace(':', '') | trim) if is_state('binary_sensor.ble_gateway', 'on') }}"

[moskovskiy82]

Might be wrong but this can be implemented via the attributes for the entity

[Ernst79]

I don’t think it will be a breaking change for BLE monitor, as the unique_id remains the same and I don’t think HA will change existing entities. But I will check that. But we have to think about other side effects, like being raised by @sg1888 . I do not (yet) understand with which attribute we can do the filtering.

[sg1888]

Since Ble Monitor has an integration ID (ble_monitor), any referencing integration may be able to enumerate the entities. @petro referenced some code in the HA forums that may be applicable: https://community.home-assistant.io/t/how-to-enumerate-entities-belonging-to-an-integration/343748/6.

This would probably necessitate some code changes to the BLE Gateway by @myhomeiot. Of course, it might end up breaking other things as well :/.