custom-cards
FR: Support visibility
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
the new visibility option is not supported, and we need to use conditional cards
Describe the solution you'd like A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
have decluttering-card support visibility
Describe alternatives you've considered A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
conditional card Additional context Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
template:
card:
# type: conditional
# conditions:
# - entity: switch.[[entity]]_privacy_mode
# state_not: 'on'
# card:
type: picture-entity
visibility:
- entity: switch.[[entity]]_privacy_mode
state_not: 'on'
entity: camera.[[entity]]
# name: '[[name]]'
show_state: false
show_name: false
camera_view: live
and card in dashboard:
- type: custom:decluttering-card
template: camera_privacy
variables:
- entity: bijkeuken
- name: Bijkeuken
as you can see in the above yaml, I tried to replace conditional card with a straight replacement using visibility it does not work, and the card is displayed no matter the visibility options set.
I also checked the core picture-entity card for support of the visibility option, and yes, that works nicely when used verbosely like
- type: picture-entity
visibility:
- entity: switch.bijkeuken_privacy_mode
state_not: 'on'
entity: camera.bijkeuken
# name: '[[name]]'
show_state: false
show_name: false
camera_view: live
thx, yes, I did. But I 'need' it on decluttering-card, and hope to prevent yet another custom card..
since the author is on a roll in button-card, hope this is the next project to modernize ;-)
Funny how this card copies almost exactly what is done here 🙃 without even attributing some credits 🤷
From readme of streamline card:
Some people so easy use "not maintained" words... Then come to HACS and request to remove the card.
I'll work on this, but I also have apexcharts-card to work on and it's another beast....
No release for 3 years, not a single commit in 3 years. I'd say it's pretty fair to assume this is not maintained. I do agree though that attribution should have been more prominent.
From readme of streamline card:
Some people so easy use "not maintained" words... Then come to HACS and request to remove the card.
say it's pretty fair to assume this is not maintained
What kind of maintainment people want from a WORKING card? I would call people "scandalmongers" who make a problem from nothing.
well, dont start a war ;-)
I've asked for some attribution https://github.com/brunosabot/streamline-card/discussions/88