Find implementations of protocol methods (cmd+alt+b)

[savagematt]

[cursive-ghost]

Definitely.

[hlship]

This is something I would fine exceptionally valuable. Lots of great navigation end right there and suddenly you are back in text-search land.

[metametadata]

+1, I use protocols extensively and would like to quickly find all the implementations (i.e. defrecords, deftypes, maybe even reify-es). Would be perfect to have the same UX as when you code in Java and see the "bubble" in the sidebar next to interface/method declaration:

[eerohele]

This would be super-useful. It's currently really awkward to navigate from protocol methods to their implementations.

[potetm]

I want to second @metametadata's suggestion. No need to resolve individual fns. Properly finding implementations of the interface (no matter what fns happen to be implemented) would be good enough for me.

[katox]

I understand that enhancing the PSI representation (and a proper resolver) is a difficult task but supporting defrecord, deftype, defprotocol and defmulti/defmethod properly would ease things a lot - and it should enable more features from the platform functionality itself.

I can workaround it by expanding the expected dependency (jar) and using a Find in Path there but I feel like a caveman doing that.

[vincent-dm]

This feature would be very useful. I miss it every day.

[Reefersleep]

+1, I really miss this functionality, it'd be amazing to have!

[amazkovoi]

+1 This would really help!

[takaczapka]

+1 Same here

[PawelStroinski]

Yeah, this would be useful. Instead I'm just searching for (method-name [ string.

[dlebrero]

+1

[ctomo]

+1 This would be very useful. Is there a roadmap to when we can expect this to be implemented?

[danieroux]

+1

[markbastian]

+1

[mtsbarbosa]

+1

[viktorkrskv0]

+1

[velios]

+1

[arnaudbos]

And another +1