Feat all child steps

[apatelia]

• Report all child steps in extra property of a step
• Include hook, expect, pw:api and test.step steps by default
• Add a new configuration option - testStepsOnly
• Allow existing behavior to report only 'test.step' steps through 'testStepsOnly' configuration
• Add a step's category, duration and location in extra property of the step
• Update README to reflect configuration and feature updates
• Add 'examples' document for testStepsOnly configuration option

BREAKING CHANGE: Include hook, expect, pw:api and test.step steps by default, but is configurable to allow for old behavior of including only test.step.

[apatelia]

I have tested it against three of my public test repositories. All have unique styles of step implementations.

1. Repo 1 - Standard Playwright styled tests
2. Repo 2 - BDD styled tests using steps implementation
3. Repo 3 - BDD styled tests using typescript decorators for steps implementation

[apatelia]

Fixes #9

[Ma11hewThomas]

Hello @apatelia, thank you for the contribution.

After testing the changes, we’d like to suggest a few adjustments.

Across various test suites, we’ve observed that the default configuration has led to a significant increase in report size, with some reports being approximately 5 times larger in file size and containing 10 times more lines.

To address this, we suggest the following configuration options:

Option	Default	Description
steps	false	Include steps in your report (includes only test steps by default)
testStepsOnly	true	When steps is enabled, include only test-specific steps

This means that, for users on the default configuration, there won't be a significant change in their reports unless they choose to include all steps explicitly.

Does this approach align with your expectations and meet the needs of users using BDD?

[apatelia]

Thanks @Ma11hewThomas! It sounds good to me. I will implement it, test it, and then update this PR.

[apatelia]

Hello @Ma11hewThomas, sorry that it took me unexpectedly long to respond to the original change request. I appreciate the testing you have done and the valid point that you have raised about the report being too big. But I think we do not need to introduce additional steps configuration variable as you have suggested. Because having two configuration variables allow for total 4 permutations, and I think it may result into a report with unintended details (i.e. bugs with the reporter).

	steps	testStepsOnly
Permutation 1	true	true
Permutation 2	true	false
Permutation 3	false	true
Permutation 4	false	false

I think that setting the testStepsOnly to true by default, we will achieve the desired effect. What do you think?