Christian Soltenborn

Hi and thanks for your PR! I currently do not have much time to work on GTA, but I will try to look into this on Sunday...

@dschwartz1957 I thought you might be interested in already trying the new project and item templates - they should work, but I didn't have the time yet to test them...

Thanks for your feature request. I thought that this might be a quick win, but are not that sure any more. The thing is that the debugger engine is configured...

Then this will have to wait until I have more available time - sorry for that...

Looks like a reasonable enhancement at first glance - we'll think about it and let you know!

To be honest, I do not have much time currently for GTA, so this is not going to be tackled in the foreseeable future by me. Of course, a PR...

Ok, sounds great! I will help you be making a release this weekend: I have a feature (support for setting environment variables) in develop branch which is not yet released,...

Just to let you know: I finished housekeeping, develop branch is ready to receive your contributions!

Sounds like a good idea to me - not sure when I will have time to look into this, though... Sorry for the late reply, btw.

The idea behind this issue is slightly different: Currently, parameterized gtest tests are "flattened" and registered with VS as "normal" tests. However, the VS test framework has an own notion...