wave_clus
wave_clus copied to clipboard
No Cluster 0
Hi Ferchaure,
I was just wondering, in instances where there is a cluster 1 but no cluster 0 (see below), does this mean that the detected units that would usually fall into cluster 0 have all grouped together to form cluster 1 instead? Is it likely that this cluster represents MUA/noise rather than SUA?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cef44/cef44aac9127182c023f6b9ab737d847b717f8e9" alt="Screen Shot 2023-02-17 at 2 41 48 PM"
Many thanks, Erica
Hi Erica,
Technically cluster 0 are the spikes thar are too far away from the known templates and usually (not a real criterion) cluster 1 is the main clusters and MUA. In your case, everything is really similar to the single template found.
In my opinion: -Try with a positive threshold I saw a few positive peaks
- That is MUA (or maybe just noise with a peak, try increasing a the detection threshold) and oddly fast for a neuron
Thank you, Ferchaure! This is very helpful.
Other than noticing a large number of spikes that break the refractory limit, what are some other ways you can distinguish MUA from SUA in the wave_clus output?
It's complicated a few MU criteria could be:
- The smallest waveform not far away from the peak... far away neurons look the same (specially when the SNR is low).
- Different levels of noise in some samples that gives you the idea that there are more than one waveform there.