Claude Muller

I am clueless on this one. Stepping through the disassembled code with the Neo Debugger works, but stepping through the Java contract code fails on the line where a static...

Instead of implementing mapping methods, i think we should rather have something like `contractParam.compareTo(StackItem item)`. Such a method should do value comparison and provide some flexibility regarding the compared types.

I will review the current implementation in context of this issue.

This doesn't fit into milestone 3.6.0 anymore. Removing it from the milestone.

Hmm, this must have been a mistake. It's issue #311 that is related to #435. This issue still remains open. But it is a minor bug in my opinion. Currently,...

> Should we plan to fix this soon? No, currently, this has less priority.

Hey @rene-haefliger, das isch s falsche Repository. Trotzdäm willkomme in dr Neo community 😉 Mir schaffe au mit Blocks, aber es goht do um Blockchain. Falls de Luscht uf e...

The first option should not be followed, since Java objects are structs in the NeoVM realm. They should not be mapped to maps. Only in the case of JSON serialisation...

This one doesn't have priority at the moment.

We are not going to implement this at the moment. **Justification** Neo-vm has only one integer type. We can map the Java `int` type to that neo-vm integer without any...