Armano den Boef
Armano den Boef
Yea, that is the best way to implement it from a web perspective
This is breaking. This would need to be moved to v4.x...
@Cenngo any progress? Do you want me to pick this up instead?
Updating to .net7 eliminates support for a massive amount of dnet users. We have been considering to move to .net6 for a long time but this discussion has also completely...
It should also be worth to implement the security patches that have been rolled out so far. Considering these patches range from remote code execution (112) to unintended privilege elevation...
It is not a bad idea I think, it will rerun the build process every time a new push is made to the pull request. It can even be installed...
> You are right, sorry, what do you think about adding `types: [opened, synchronize]`? That's what is used in https://github.com/NetCordDev/NetCord/blob/alpha/.github/workflows/documentation-preview.yml#L5 The only thing you lose out on in this circumstance...
My bad, I read this:  and thought that was all it was
> Might be better to use a `ResultHandlers` namespace or something similar, just to shorten the names in this case. You would not write these names more than once in...
I honestly disagree with this, it makes things more confusing than they have to be. Note, I did already say 'When they are imported' in regards to revealing namespaces.