Christopher L. Shannon

@milleruntime, @EdColeman and @ctubbsii - I pushed an update, let me know what you think. It updates the documentation to make it clear that the results are an estimate. The...

@ctubbsii - So I've made a few comments already as I'm sure you saw but just to summarize there are 2 main things that need to be decided/agreed on so...

Thanks for the clarification, I'll work on an update today to simply things greatly and just use the metadata for size but keep the current API and command output and...

@ctubbsii - I reduced the scope of this significantly and pushed an update, it's now ready for review again. I will create another issue when I get a chance for...

I created PR #2938 which bumps to log4j2 2.19.0 which was released yesterday and a couple other minor updates.

So should we go ahead close this PR? Reading over everything I agree that it doesn't seem like the utility is useful to expose to everyone and is only helpful...

> I'm of the opinion that we should have a common way for interacting with all utilities. If the utility is not useful, then maybe it should be removed. I...

@milleruntime and @dlmarion - thanks for the feedback, I'll re-work the PR and move it to the Admin command like the others. Can we go ahead and merge #2881 first?...

@dlmarion - I went ahead and just started over from main and just removed the file in a new commit and force pushed up as that seemed cleanest since we...

@gemmellr - Yeah, this could be merged as is and then add a follow on PR for getBody, isBodyssignable and JMSConsumer receive body. I think those should be implemented for...