Ralph Andalis

@jmanico, almost those 18 requirements I have drafted there were straight from the RFC's best current practice. I may have left some out, which I will do another few passes...

Thanks @tghosth, @jmanico and @elarlang for chiming in your thoughts and praises! It is still draft at first stages, but I had a lot of dilemmas presenting these requirements as...

Still doing some clean-up and trimming it down. Any number for the new section that I should use, @tghosth? I agree that the current 3.5.1 should be obsolete after this...

Also, combing through the RFCs and related documents together with searching the net for any CWEs that I can map the new OAuth 2.0 requirements and could not piece them...

@tghosth, I did not add anymore CWE mapping for the draft pull request. Regarding the complexity of requirements, I agree with you that maybe we should just focus on OAuth2...

@tghosth, apologies for being MIA. Conferences and work travel has taken over the past few months. If we have an instant messaging channel/system we use, please add me there too...

No scare at all! Just got flying to different places and cities for work recently and got a breather. Yes please, for now we can use LinkedIn messaging until the...

@szh, if this is an acceptable cheatsheet proposal, shall I start a PR for a draft I have?

Ooops @mackowski, I just realized the first Pull Request I made is just for my own fork... how silly. I created a new PR for the master branch. This is...

> Hey all after look at this documents for this issue i have come up with some points in order to help everyone here: > > If this sounds like...