Chad Scherrer

> @cscherrer many thanks for the detailed answer. > > I made some further explorations on my own and had a few issues: > > 1. I went through the...

Hi @mohamed82008 , Sorry I had missed this! I'd love to connect Soss with Turing. I already have `rand` and `logpdf` defined for any model. Just to be clear, you...

Sounds reasonable, but it will only work for a few cases. What if some values are discrete?

What do you see missing for this to be supported? Can you give an example of how you'd like to use this in a model? It seems like this could...

Excellent idea. Currently this is blocked by #42, and will require some refactoring in both Soss and @thautwarm 's [GeneralizedGenerated.jl](https://github.com/thautwarm/GeneralizedGenerated.jl)

Let me know if any of this is unclear or if you have other ideas, and we can discuss :)

Not really. There's a `Likelihood` that I think can be really nice. We could do something like Distributions (even calling that code when it helps), but we can also take...

Great idea @gdalle ! It seems like we could get this to work, but we'll need some extra steps. I think I'd first get `suffstats` to work. If we call...

Thanks @devmotion , this is an interesting idea. It does limit some things though, for example in many cases it's useful to be able to specify a container type, like...

Hey @devmotion , I think I was too dismissive of this idea. It doesn't solve the _entire_ problem, but it does solve part of it, and I'm starting to think...