Sarven Capadisli

Yes, it is "encouraged" for the time being for all the reasons I've outlined in https://github.com/solid/specification/pull/185 . Is there sufficient data making the case either way for Solid servers? How...

Pavlik, for the umpteenth time, stop mischaracterising things. RDFa is a concrete RDF syntax as per W3C. You don't have to accept that reality or even like it. We, the...

>The goal of this issue is to discuss whether or not such a list makes sense No need. Each technical report will require the formats it needs. Solid fundamentally recommends...

Thanks @ianbjacobs ! Am/we're aware. Short response: Going forward, the CG will produce CG-DRAFT/FINAL reports as you recommend as well as per [Solid CG charter](https://www.w3.org/community/solid/charter/). Longer response: The latest published...

I will PR a CG-DRAFT (and eventually FINAL) of the Solid Protocol based on [ED](https://solidproject.org/ED/protocol). I have the CG-DRAFT ready but was waiting on the possible resolution of some of...

@ianbjacobs I think we already covered this earlier in the issue and elsewhere. Just for clarity for those not heavily involved in the CG or who need a summary: Our...

Quick status update: I have the CG-DRAFT ready but decided not to PR yet. Traveling today. I will do it this week in a calmer moment/space. More details will be...

>What reason do you see for the 'ED' not to be a CG draft? That might be begging the question =) The initial intention was to not have our `ED/protocol`...

>I would like to have clarity on which of the available templates should be used W3C Team / Ian can correct me but as per https://www.w3.org/standards/types/#x2-1-w3c-community-group-report-or-w3c-business-group-report and https://www.w3.org/community/reports/reqs/ and irrespective...

The "W3C stylesheet for CG-DRAFT" being https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/2021/cg-draft