Sarven Capadisli

+1 to CC BY *Edited*: if CC BY (or something more restrictive), it needs to be associated with legal entities eg. MIT, list of contributors. CC 0 would be a...

@kjetilk If "All rights reserved", reserved to who? Which legal entity? Many people have contributed to the documentation over the years in different ways eg. through github, gitter, as well...

I couldn't disagree more. The "community" - we can debate about its composition - is what got Solid to this point. Not Inrupt Inc. or any single entity. I don't...

@melvincarvalho, you've left out an important context from the chat. I was responding to why I don't feel comfortable with *a* particular discussion forum: https://forum.solidproject.org/tos#3 and that it had to...

I presume this is for general Solid chat, and in that case probably better to link to https://gitter.im/solid/chat instead of Gitter's home/explore. Twitter and ActivityPub fediverse have variety of hashtags...

To be accurate, I did not say or know for a fact that "gitter chat room shares user data with Google Analytics". What I said was "Gitter includes Google Analytics...

I think this use case can be generalised to: _x_ requests permission on _y_ (in order to perform operation _z_) We've discussed the notion of requesting previously in chats, as...

@rubensworks Can you please elaborate? Just to be clear, I am indeed making the distinction between the use cases about requesting access and requesting changes to be made. The notification...

You're right. I've generalised and then added related stuff. The original issue pertains to what you've emphasised in Melvin's request. What I was trying to get at is that eventually...

I think 201 is not guaranteed in this case since the server only signals that the request will be looked into - which is kind of what we're saying with...